Worst-case analysis of non-cooperative load balancing

نویسندگان

  • Olivier Brun
  • Balakrishna J. Prabhu
چکیده

We investigate the impact of heterogeneity in the amount of incoming traffic routed by dispatchers in a non-cooperative load balancing game. For a fixed amount of total incoming traffic, we give sufficient conditions on the cost function under which the worst-case social cost occurs when each dispatcher routes the same amount of traffic, that is, the game is symmetric. We then analyze the symmetric game and derive an explicit expression for the equilibrium flows. We also obtain lower bounds on the Price of Anarchy for (i) cost functions that are polynomial on server loads; and (ii) cost functions representing the mean delay of the Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT) service discipline.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Is Price of Anarchy the Right Measure for Load-Balancing Games?

Price of Anarchy is an oft-used worst-case measure of the inefficiency of non-cooperative decentralized architectures. For a non-cooperative load-balancing game with two classes of servers and for a finite or infinite number of dispatchers, we show that the Price of Anarchy is an overly pessimistic measure that does not reflect the performance obtained in most instances of the problem. We expli...

متن کامل

Price of anarchy in non-cooperative load balancing games

We investigate the price of anarchy of a load balancing game with K dispatchers. The service rates and holding costs are assumed to depend on the server, and the service discipline is assumed to be processor-sharing at each server. The performance criterion is taken to be the weighted mean number of jobs in the system, or equivalently, the weighted mean sojourn time in the system. Independently...

متن کامل

Numerical studies on a paradox for non-cooperative static load balancing in distributed computer systems

Numerical examples of a Braess-like paradox in which adding capacity to a distributed computer system may degrade the performance of all users in the system have been reported. Unlike the original Braess paradox, in the models examined, this behavior occurs only in the case of finitely many users and not in the case of infinite number of users and the degree of performance degradation can incre...

متن کامل

On the Competitive Analysis of Randomized Static Load Balancing

Static load balancing is attractive due to its simplicity and low communication costs. We analyze under which circumstances a randomized static load balancer can achieve good balance if the subproblem sizes are unknown and choosen by an adversary. It turns out that this worst case scenario is quite close to a more specialized model for applications related to parallel backtrack search. In both ...

متن کامل

Braess Paradox in Non-Cooperative Dynamic Load Balancing For the Cohen-Kelly Computer Network Model

---------------------------------------------ABSTRACT-----------------------------------------We consider a distributed computer system in Wardrop equilibrium, i.e., situations where no user can reduce its own response time by unilaterally choosing another path, if all the other users retain their present paths. The Braess paradox is a famous example of paradoxical cases where adding capacity t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Annals OR

دوره 239  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016